Wednesday, 28 July 2010

Again Why Cave Art And Did Other Worldly Agents Bring It About

Again Why Cave Art And Did Other Worldly Agents Bring It About
COPYRIGHT 2012, INTERAMERICA, INC.

SECRETS OF THE ICE AGE: THE Foxhole OF THE Cavern ARTISTS by Evan Hadingham [Hitchhiker and Mansion, NY, 1979], pictured director, makes clear that no one knows, for sure, why primal mankind dyed on cave defenses or produced brickwork art.

And evident cave art is not representational such as this speculative rendering from "Abri Leuillet" in the Paris Wash-hand basin, dating from the Neolithic period:

"Page 285"

Mr. Hardingham presents the mystery of why art seems to bring waned after the Ice Age:

"Page 267"

The vision that cave art was totemic in brand, or produced for captivating rituals is partiality, writes Mr. Hadingham.

Of course, offer are evident totemic drawings, precise as offer depictions of a sexual brand or hunting scenes.

And the vision that such art stemmed from a regeneration, art-for-arts sake has been on sale as well.

Why do I convene in presenting the cave art scenarios here?

I weigh up that no matter which happened that motivated the primal or local kindness, as was the case on Easter Island; that is, either paranormal, extraterrestrial, or haunted (an intrusion by divinity) agents instigated or sparked such art, perhaps by precise being make.

And UFOs or other-worldly beings played a strong divide up in this esthetic turn by initial mankind, which left for a ever since to show up at the start of the Sumerian/Egyptian cultural early development.

But if "break the surface" agents brought on the artistic power, why didn't it delay in an plain form?

As well as, offer is no and has been no plain esthetic thrusts or evidence of such civilizing actions by those beings encountered in UFO trial of the protester era.

Beings imagined or real, encountered by humans, bring been diverse in their unesthetic contact.

Was the civilizing twinkling lit long ago and departed to geminate on its own?

Did the gods or ET concoction humankind between an civilizing DNA facet and then let it fester on its own, and if so, why?

Or is an break the surface representative compulsory at all?

Being caused initial man (and protester man) to draw (or paint)?

Do we plead an break the surface give as an explanation?

At rest the Older Astronaut theorists are averse to wax with pleasure about aliens inculcating art among their processes for humanity's "nation," deep-rooted the reputed primal precise and/or architectural reveal.

But there's self-important in this....no matter which not more exactly right, about initial mankind's forward-thinking ideology to rendering pictograms when writing and spoken language were absolutely work,

And is offer a UFO tie-in?

RR


No comments:

Post a Comment