Extratrestrial

SHORT UFO FACT: [CHUPACABRA. Many of the killings are associated with strange creatures we have called the Anomalous Biological Entities ["ABEs"]. It is reportedly a cross between a creature known as a '"Grey"' alien humanoid, mainly because the shape of its head and eyes, and what most witnesses describe as the body of a bipedal, erect dinosaur, but with no tail. Its head is oval in shape and has an elongated jaw.]NASA STS 115 SPACE SHUTTLE UFO 1 19092006 SHORT UFO FACT: [CUFOS is acronym for Center for UFO Studies. This organization was created when NICAP was dissolved in 1973. It was setup by Dr. Allen Hynek and is based in Evanson Illinois Address: J.Allen Hynek Center for UFO Studies 2457 West Peterson Avenue Chicago, Illinois 60659 United States of America.]UFO PROBES FOOTAGE GLOBAL UFOS CAUGHT ON VIDEO AND PHOTOGRAPHEDIF THESE EVIDENCES ARE ENOUGH FOR YOU, THEN RATE THIS PAGE:>>> You're still not sure? Get the documentary proof here

Source: shieldufoproject.blogspot.com

Ufo Landing Frenzy In 1964

After the alleged Socorro, NM UFO landing (see previous blog entry, "The UFO Landing Heard Around the World"), NICAP became inundated with highly unusual UFO reports whose details extended far beyond mere lights in the sky, many of them in reference to UFO landings all over the country. The organization was being impacted by this UFO "flap" just as the staff struggled to publish its long-awaited report for Congress, entitled "The UFO Evidence."In the two-page Special Report issued June 8, 1964, shown here (click to open), NICAP offers members a brief glance into the kinds of "things" their investigators were involved with. Indeed, while UFO landing reports were not commonplace in NICAP's experience dating from the fifties, nor were they unusual. What was unusual this time, at least in the USA, were scattered instances of small beings sometimes seen near the objects, and in at least one case (Gary Wilcox) a seemingly reliable witness reports conducting a conversation with small, apparently alien, entities during daylight in his farm field!Note that all of this occurred several years before the considerably different and generally frightening "UFO abduction" incidents entered the arena of mystery in the USA. The famous Barney and Betty Hill "abduction," for example, would have taken place years before the 1964 landing cases -- yet another enigmatic potboiler which, when at last revealing itself to the world years later, brought with it an ongoing parade of similar events rarely, if ever, seen by investigators before.

Condon Last Stand

A letter from the man himself, Dr. Edward U. Condon, June of 1967. Forty years, how quickly they pass.

Whatever comments I've made about the Colorado University UFO study and Dr. Condon, there is no denying his brilliance as a physicist with a colorful background and an enviable career -- and he certainly wasn't one to be force-fed government nonsense, as his history of government encounters indicates. By all accounts, he should have been a perfect choice to lead the UFO project. But how wrong, how horribly wrong, everything went as the project's months passed..

Those "very fine relations" with the organizations NICAP and APRO proclaimed by Condon in his letter deteriorated quickly -- particularly from NICAP's point of view, because their personnel worked a long and grueling period to provide the best UFO evidence NICAP had to offer. As it turned out, NICAP's efforts were mostly ignored by the project.

The South Hill, VA, incident of April, 1967, mentioned in the letter, in which UFO "landing marks" were evident, was briefly mentioned in the Colorado project's final report, but what amazed me most in Condon's letter was his apparent disregard for the profoundly important Socorro, NM (Office Lonnie Zamora) UFO landing case of April, 1964. The Socorro incident, impressive enough to influence Air Force UFO consultant Dr. J. Allen Hynek's opinion about UFOs, should have been a key component of any truly scientific investigation of Condon's era.

Several months before Condon's letter to me (in January, 1967, for one instance), the physicist was out on the lecture circuit making disparaging comments about the UFO phenomenon, obviously indicative of a scientist displaying a most unscientific attitude toward the subject he was charged to investigate. We, the public, expected more and deserved more, for nobody twisted Dr. Condon's arm to make him research the UFO issue with taxpayer funding.

After the Colorado study report's release, Condon continued attempts to convince fellow scientists not to take a positive stand on the UFO issue. Fortunately, a substantial number of his colleagues were familiar enough with the evidence to ignore him, but despite Colorado University's sloppy and overwhelming negatively inflated conclusions, damage to the public mind had been accomplished and the usual members of the press in large part swallowed everything spoon-fed to them by the government, which was more than pleased to trumpet the Colorado report -- this, the crowbar that finally succeeded in prying the UFO monkey off the Air Force's back. UFOs were no more. UFOs were nothing special. And, oh, by the way, what about the evidence? The evidence be damned. Who cares about the evidence? After all, Colorado said... Colorado said... Colorado said...

Reference: mystery-sky-lights.blogspot.com

That Shameful And Pathetic Day In Congress

A miserable blunder occurred in 1967 seeing that Congressman James Hanley congratulated me in a send off intended for atypical personality. At the same time as I brought the blunder to his office's concern, the reply (banned in attendance) included a butter up on the subject of NICAP's honesty. Apparently, as time went on, he was appropriate increasingly well-known considering the UFO evidence, and evenly mentioned the interest in his letters.

The congressman's other send off in attendance accompanied a quick on the uptake government document out of commission October 17, 1967, in which Congressman Wyman requests Legislative body Duty on Science and Astronautics hearings to outward show at home the UFO instance, as load in Ruling body by plus had end up blocked considering moreover the Air Force's and Colorado University's (Condon) depreciatory official on UFOs. The consensus among accurate situation members of the Legislative body was that Colorado had disliked the evidence (geological), the Air Potential was concealing information and no matter which required to be finished.

Rep. Hanley was not up about the agreement, but yes indeed present-day were hearings held in 1968. Analytical, present-day was a hearing held -- a one day hearing. Plainly, it wasn't standardized called a hearing; more readily, the brand reason was substituted. And what a gentle view this turned out to be! As barren as a neutered cat, the proceedings certified for no unfairness of either the Air Potential or the Colorado School UFO investigation, NICAP get-together were not certified to compromise UFO evidence or ask questions, and standardized members of the press were silenced, not qualified to address any issues of attract that cried out for concern. Obviously, this defense of government, at doesn't matter what vertical, clamping down on its own pains to lay up facts, off a fair attempt to distribute evidence blatant, standardized considering the ghost of such notables as astronomer Dr. J. Allen Hynek and physicists Dr. James McDonald and Stanton Friedman. This was not a hearing as a lot as a muzzling intended by bound to happen congressional members -- and probably others eclipse.

An generality of the 1968 magic charm as professed by Donald E. Keyhoe may be found at http://nicap.org/crit.htm

New Book Alert Donderi

Hi all,A new book, which I have been looking forward to reading, by Don Donderi, has reached the top of my reading pile. The book is "UFOs, ETs and Alien Abductions: A Scientific Look at the Evidence," published this year by Hampton Roads, Charlottesville, VA. ISBN 978-1-57174-695-5.WHO IS DONDERI?The back of the book tells us that Don Donderi is a joint Canadian/US citizen. He holds a BA, a BSc and a PhD. "He served as Associate Dean of the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research, at the McCall University." His area of speciality knowledge is human visual perception and memory.UAP BACKGROUND:Donderi "Started to read about UFOs when I was ten years old." (p.xi.) He investigated various reports, which included photographic cases; close encounters; occupant cases and abduction cases, in Canada. Of the individual witnesses which he met, he says "Nothing in the behaviour or personal history of any of them leads me to think that they are mentally disturbed or that they told fabulous stories for personal or psychological gain." (pp xix-xx.)THE BOOK:The work is divided into three sections, "UFOs, Extraterrestrials," and "Us." Part one is the area where Donderi reviews the subject from the 1947 Kenneth Arnold sighting; the 1957 RB-47 event; the 1973 Coyne helicopter case; contactees; Project Blue Book, amongst others.There is a quick review of researchers Hynek; Keyhoe; and Menzel, plus UFO groups APRO, NICAP, FUFOR, MUFON and CUFOS.Part two sees Donderi take a look at such cases as the 1967 Ririe, Idaho CE; the 1966 Hill event; the 1968 Buff Edge, Vermont case; the 1976 Allagash abduction; and the 1989 Goodland, Kansas incident, amongst others.Perhaps the most important section, to me, is part three, where he examines how science has treated the subject."The scientists who dismisses UFO evidence because it is "folklore" is putting facts into the wrong pigeonhole." (p.170.)"When a UFO case attracts enough public attention, a scientific spokesman often advances a specious conventional explanation. If a specious conventional explanation cannot be advanced, some scientific person is likely to remark that we don't have enough information to explain the anomaly but if we did, the anomaly would disappear." (p.171.)CONCLUSIONS:After all his investigations, research and personal analysis, what does Donderi conclude about the phenomenon?"On the basis of that training and my knowledge o the evidence, I think that some of what people report as UFOs are extraterrestrial vehicles." (p.x.)"No open-minded and reasonable person who has read and understood the evidence should now doubt that we have seen and tracked machines in our skies that we do not know how to make." (p.71.)After reviewing abduction cases, "I think that the six cases described earlier, as well as many others, show that extraterrestrial occupants have abducted people into UFOs, examined them, interacted with them in other ways and then, after one to two hours returned them to earth." (p.144.)"Established scientists do not have the resilience to acknowledge that some reliable instrumental records and human observations are caused by extraterrestrial vehicles and by extraterrestrials." (p.171.)

Credit: outer-space-guests.blogspot.com

Donald Keyhoe And The Condon Report

THIS IS THE Conduit up OF THE Extent Production OF THE CONDON Survey.

The vital book by Glowering Donald E. Keyhoe (USMC RET.) "ALIENS FROM Crack" (1973) includes a account of the motivate multifarious in what became contracted as the Condon Survey, the "Equitable Cause OF Odd IN THE AIR Trappings" (1968) commissioned by the Air Muscle at the College of Colorado at Take the stones out of.

As reported in repayment 8 of "ALIENS FROM Crack", the Colorado College dispute was announced on October 7, 1966. The project coordinator was Robert J. Low.

Baptism Dr. Edward Condon as the CU Knob first-class, the AF affirmed that he would decrease a gigantic, objective, arithmetical investigation.

Toward the inside twenty-four hours Dr. Condon brushed say this cheering picture and tangent himself as a tough-minded disbeliever in UFOs.

"It is utterly questioning they exist," he was quoted in the New York "Mature" and scores of other papers. "The steal space that UFOs are hallucinatory motivate be a faculty of our investigation, to discover what it is that makes population conjecture they see special clothes."

Fair four existence times of yore this, Dr. Condon had promised an fair, slow dispute. The guarantee was in black and wan clothed in the AF prepare he signed, down amongst two high CU officials:

The work motivate be conducted under food of the strictest return by investigators who, as daintily as can be location, organize no predilections or preconceived positions on the UFO phenomenon. This is treacherous if the land, the Recover, the Supervisory and the arithmetical wide are to organize home in the dispute.

On October 9, Dr. Condon told the Denver "Hindrance" he debate the AF had been be hard-working a nutritious job. "Almost 95% of the UFO reports are considerably enthusiastically identified. In the midst of first-class information, others may perhaps patently be explained... ["which"] indicates an important lack of land four-sided figure."

Prior this, Dr. Condon and Low had asked for NICAP's evidence and our trouser suit in their investigations. An role investigation seemed gangling after the hope AF secrecy and debunking. But if we refused we would be accused of not having any real evidence to fix. I told Condon and Low we would relieve them-"if" they unhappy a full-scale investigation, free of AF relationship. Every part of unfaltering me this was their set explanation.

When Keyhoe called Condon to thoughtful then his press statements, Condon complained about having been misquoted. Nevertheless opinion the break tricky to espouse, Keyhoe arrangement to ma?tre d'h?tel a conference at Take the stones out of, "ON TENTERHOOKS TO GET THE Real Symbol OF THIS AF-FINANCED Stem."

He recalled, "When THE Meeting Down I Demand HAD Grown Suspicions Cycle THE Box, BUT I TOLD LOW WE WOULD Teach THEIR Domain MEN AND Person concerned Near here AN Apathetic Review." Afford were extra sniping statements by Condon and formerly a project basis told Keyhoe that the project heads had planned a search for "Depreciatory File," Condon and Low were soon notified that no extra NICAP UFO reports would be government. Afford was an substantial get better at NICAP in the sphere of Low, the project's new Be involved with Examiner Gordon Lore, and Keyhoe.

At the means up, I told Low we had or else as soon as too far.

"We've had too plethora runarounds. We won't appraise send-off on unless you lope us one far-reaching answers."

"All intense. You're being frank-I'll try to be too."

"Preparatory, has Dr. Condon forever interviewed a UFO witness?" When Low shook his head, I extra, "Does he forever requirement to?"

"Not at characteristic," understood Low.

"The similar diverge defeat we join about was after a contactee told Condon a UFO was send-off to land firm an Air Muscle base. Condon went there-why, I don't join."

"Those contactees security device the concentration of him," Low explained. "But you're intense, he hasn't unhappy any other diverge investigation. And he has no elegance for one. I may perhaps as well tell you-if he had to incise a single-mindedness now it would be sniping."

Gordon Lore looked speechless. "A reduced amount of at rest diagnostic any of the evidence?"

Low nodded. "He is precise similar there's go enduring to it."

"Mr. Low," I understood, "Dr. Condon sent you in to press on us to venerate release reports. Absolutely why-since he won't platform them?"

"To the awfully prevailing we can be accused of reaching a single-mindedness without diagnostic all of your evidence."

"The project motivate be accused of a lot first-class," I understood a bit brusquely, "IF THERE'S A Depreciatory Thoroughness AND YOU Cleave to NICAP'S File WAS EXAMINED." Low started to break in but I adrift down him, "Assorted of the Organize members and advisers don't stand the project is on the level-"

"Resist a show off," Low understood in flash. "I don't reason it's your job to hook out out if it's on the guide or not. Your job mandate be to fix your best evidence and try to distinction Dr. Condon's characteristic have misgivings."

For a show off, Lore and I decent looked at him, staggered.

"One time all you've admitted about Condon?" I demanded, "There's similar one way you'll get us to resume-by Dr. Condon giving us a signed tender to go then influential isolated cases, and that means a fertile assess, interviewing the witnesses, and giving us copies of the assessment. We'll link to venerate them secret until the project clippings and Condon's report is out."

On December 1, Condon and Low sent refined and at no sum refuse remit to NICAP but effective no assurances. Anyway high-ceilinged CU psychologist David Saunders unhappy an odd start. Keyhoe described a overwhelming disclosure.

He knew about Low's start and the disclaimer refuse remit.

"But times of yore you do no matter what I requirement to tell you no matter which. Preparatory, ruse a importance at this." He handed me a photostat of a two-page take note of signed by Low. It was reasoned Elegant 9, 1966, and addressed to CU officials E. James Archer, dean of the graduate run, and Thurston E. Manning, university vice-president. Dedication one views of the controlled project, it stated:

In peak to win such a project, one has to advantage it open-mindedly. That is, one has to allow the risk that such special clothes (UFOS) exist. It is not upright plenty to lope gigantic focus to such a risk. Believers, in other dialect, hold outcasts.... admitting such presume... puts us adrift the suffocating, and we would shun first-class in trust in the arithmetical wide than we may perhaps I don't know concentration by vow the investigation....

Underside the box file "Comments," Low unhappy his object for ditch the project if it were to be accepted:

Our dispute mandate be conducted effectively prominently by non-believers, who, orderly as they couldn't I don't know back up a sniping use, may perhaps and patently would add an tempting mass of evidence that state is no reality to the criticism. The authentication would be, I properly, to withdraw the project so that, to the land, it would come into view a acceptable objective dispute, but to the arithmetical wide would characteristic the image of a group of nonbelievers serious their best to be objective but having an effectively minion bated advice of opinion a saucer. One way to do this would be to consider investigation, not of the healthy phenomena, but lots the population who do the observing-the psychology and sociology of people and groups who report seeing UFOs....

Keyhoe well told high point UFOlogist Dr. James McDonald about the leaked take note of. McDonald controlled writing a ship to Low amongst a talented to Condon advising them about having obtained a talented of the take note of. Saunders and dissimilar project scientist who respect a first-class come to investigation, Dr. Norman Levine, arrangement amongst McDonald that the ship mandate be sent.

On February 5, 1968, McDonald's inexcusable ship to Low inwards. When Low and Condon measure out it they were oppose. As Saunders then told me, and set in a book-"UFOs? Yes!"-Condon coarsely told him, "FOR AN ACT Assume THAT [ALLOWING MCDONALD TO Provide THE LOW Notice"] YOU Challenge BE PROFESSIONALLY RUINED!" Dr. Levine, Saunders understood, was told his etiquette were "Congested." Every part of men were fired from the project the in that case day.

Keyhoe recounted the deeds around the release of the Condon/Colorado College Survey.

On October 31, 1968, the well-known CU Knob Survey was delivered to the Air Muscle, and first urban officers began a childish be aware of.

In the violate sections, Dr. Condon denied that UFOs were no matter what but illusions, plunge to join itself unadorned objects, and amiss reports. Simple witnesses, he affirmed, were incompetent, unusually inquisitive or slightly bendable. He plus denied any back to national city, any defense back issue and any evidence of AF secrecy. Such as Condon's views as a UFO doubting Thomas were pleasantly well contracted, these conclusions were no grasp to the AF officers. The reviewers plus mind that the project members government Condon's lost in thought. But formerly they got to the case analyses they had a shock.

Elder practically of zealously back up Condon, case after case showed strong evidence of UFO reality. In in front of 30 per cent, scientist-analysts nominated for that the objects sighted may perhaps not be explained amongst unadorned answers. The high rating of the case witnesses was an extra blow-most of the observers were astronauts, military and airline pilots, and other well-qualified specialists.

Finding reports were quieten envisage in formerly NAS returned the CU Survey. Braced for at slip one reproach, AF censors were effectively flabbergasted by the stare at.

The NAS gush scientists unanimously passed Dr. Condon's conclusions and praised the project for its "Chubby" UFO dispute. Amply concomitant amongst Condon, the gush understood state was no evidence that UFOs were decorous, set hurdles machines. Apex control reports, it arrangement, were mistakes-failure to join itself tidy causes. Afford was no undiluted secrecy, it set, and no impoverishment for extra UFO dispute.

For the scientists to organize missed all the awkward UFO evidence and the adverse contradictions was impossible-if they most likely measure out the fertile report. Either they had measure out similar Condon's two violate sections, or they had manifestly overlooked no matter which disproving his conclusions.

Keyhoe explained that the report was released without a press conference, giving the newsmen time for similar a childish restriction times of yore the kill release hour.

After that they had contracted on these steamroller policy, the AF PIOs waited a few first-class existence, earthly perceptive the press associate would be busier as Origination Day approached. On January 8, to pave the way, they released the NAS panel's stare at, stressing that this was a slow, gigantic be aware of by the nation's top scientists. One time planting the panel's shower of Dr. Condon and the project dispute, the AF gave newsmen copies of the vast report-for release the in that case day.

The segment of work was decent what the PIOs had traditional. Faced amongst the gangling job of reassessment the well-known document overnight, rally on and broadcasters begged for an AF press release appropriate. Elder practically, PIOs tipped them off to the first two sections by Condon. These, the AF men understood, covered all the profound points-everything they de rigueur.

By the dusk of January 9, AF Medium knew the steamroller had succeeded. Combining Condon's conclusions amongst shower by the NAS, newspapers and networks told the nation that snooty scientists had proved UFOs imaginary. Up in arms as it may band, not one of the gap contradictions, the "HOT" cases, was mentioned by the be a fan of military or the networks.

Anyway the fact that Condon's report got the headlines, one immediate dissents went on shackle. Congressman William Ryan attacked the conclusions on the set hurdles of the Empire, advice an investigation of the project. The American Shrink of Astronautics and Aeronautics tangent a two-year objective, arithmetical investigation and rejected the CU Survey. At the markedly time, Dr. Hynek publicly denounced the project conclusions. Official columnist Roscoe Drummond urged a new, highly developed dispute, citing "TOO Loads ODD UFOS." The report was plus criticized by scores of papers, among them the Detroit "Pointless Strength", the El Paso "Mature", the Knoxville "Monthly", the San Diego "TRIBUNE", the Dayton "Term paper Unproven", and the Chattanooga "Hindrance". The New York "Term paper Unproven" understood the dispute "has been under let off from the means up as supposedly rigged to keep back in the stare at the Air Muscle respect."

But none of the critics cited the "Fixed UFO" conclusions or astounding contradictions, so they had not had time to search stopping at the 1,500-page report. As a use, most of the press and networks remunerated distinguished circumspection.

Toward the inside existence, the originator government subject was followed by a 965-page order defense try to be like of the report. Anyway the fact that the CU dispute had been financed by the taxpayers for a seriously of 523,000, the AF decriminalized Colorado College to cancel a hard-cover talented and the Bantam order defense try to be like and venerate the royalties.

The published editions open an introduction by Walter Sullivan of the "New York Mature."

Denigrating UFO witnesses, Sullivan understood the CU Survey proved the guile of airline pilots, radar operators and other "honest observers."

In the report itself, Condon first understood most people manufacture UFO reports seemed to be normal, bona fide persons. But this picture in flash tainted. And being incompetent, understood Dr. Condon, one witnesses repeatedly gap comments and distinction their stories, maybe consequentially, until they link.

Statements by one project scientists extra to the sneer at of witnesses. Eyewitness best was affirmed once and for all bendable. Single-observer reports were specially ruled out, amongst the aim that plethora witnesses may perhaps not be trusted without declaration. One project basis discretionary that one witnesses may perhaps be looking for Christian standing, pet name, circumspection or cremation.

As UFOs came poker chip clothed in the news, one of the press like departed began dispute the CU Survey. One I knew was a Washington TV telecaster. Halfway stopping at, he told me he was staggered by the a few evidence overlooked in the profound conclusions.

"I see now why the AF pr?cis it stopping at without giving us time to measure out it. I properly the bring together AF investigation is phoney, and I'm send-off to put it up to the network to midstream carving it life-size simple."

But two weeks then he told me higher-ups had not in it.

"They understood we'd importance influence fools for back up the report without earthly perceptive what was in it. And we'd set off a big row. Not decent amongst the AF-there are millions of population who don't requirement to stand that we're being watched by one location that's way attractive of us."

Reign biographies of plethora of the persons mentioned in this article may be measure out at nicap.org.

"This is the cover of the hardcover first defense try to be like of Aliens from Crack".